Home » Insights » Guidewire Cloud migration: faster innovation, lower costs, bigger impact
Guidewire Cloud migration: faster innovation, lower costs, bigger impact
Jan 27, 2026 Guidewire , Article , Cloud, Data migration, Guidewire

Moving core systems to Guidewire Cloud helps turn migration into measurable business value.


The adoption of Guidewire Cloud is accelerating across markets, with many insurers now viewing the move as a business decision rather than just an infrastructure change. One important point to note early on is that data migration is often considered a 'later' topic, yet it informs many of the most challenging decisions, including scope, quality, compliance, reporting and the capabilities of the business on day one. Taking a data-driven approach from the outset reduces surprises and protects the value proposition.

The biggest shift is simple: instead of spending energy on running and upgrading the platform, organisations can focus more on speed, automation, making better decisions based on data, and developing modern underwriting capabilities.

This article explains what typically drives a Guidewire Cloud migration from on-prem, what business value to expect, how to choose the right migration strategy, and how to run the programme with fewer surprises.

What is Guidewire Cloud (in simple terms)?

Guidewire Cloud is a cloud-based delivery model for Guidewire’s core capabilities in policy administration, billing, and claims handling. It provides a scalable and secure foundation designed to support insurers’ evolving operational and regulatory needs. In practice, it provides insurers with a modern baseline platform to run core systems consistently across markets, while avoiding the effort of building and operating the full cloud setup themselves.

Why are insurers moving from Guidewire on-prem to the cloud now?

In practice, cloud programmes rarely begin with “we want cloud” as the only reason. More often, the decision is triggered by a combination of business and operating-model pressures:

  • Speed of change: insurers want improvements to products, pricing and underwriting improvements to be made faster. In the cloud, frequent releases bring new functionality that enables quick adaptation to market needs – without upgrade-heavy cycles – while automatic updates keep security up-to-date.
  • Security and resilience expectations: stronger continuity and disaster recovery are increasingly a baseline requirement, especially in regulated environments.
  • Integration and ecosystem pressure: connecting to third-party providers and insurtech partners is becoming a competitive necessity, and organisations want to reduce the long-term cost of onboarding new services.
  • Cost and skills availability: infrastructure expertise is scarce and expensive, so insurers aim to shift internal teams from platform maintenance to innovation and modernisation that deliver visible business value.
  • Operating model shift: in Guidewire Cloud, Guidewire takes on more platform operations, changing how teams handle issues and adopt releases.
A Breakthrough Year for Cloud in Insurance

Get the Predictions Report & explore 2026 insurance industry trends.

What business value can be unlocked by migrating to Guidewire Cloud

A successful Guidewire Cloud migration should be focused on business outcomes rather than the process itself. The greatest value usually comes from automation and operational efficiency, better decision-making based on improved data, and underwriting modernisation. This helps insurers to reduce manual effort, scale up without linear cost growth, improve reporting and analytics, and adjust products and risk selection faster.

Many organisations also aim to enable risk-sharing arrangements and partner operating models, improved integration speed (and savings over time) through easier onboarding of partners and third-party services, and a clearer CAPEX-to-OPEX shift with more predictable spend and less dependency on owned infrastructure. As a general rule, if you cannot identify three to five measurable outcomes, there is a risk that the programme will become “a cloud project” rather than a business transformation.

Which migration strategy should you choose: lift-and-shift or greenfield?

There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Two common strategies are:

Option 1: Lift-and-shift (upgrade + move)

This approach prioritises technical upgrades and migrations, followed by a progressive activation of new business capabilities. This can be a pragmatic way to reduce disruption and move faster – especially if the organisation wants to stabilise the core before implementing more significant changes.

Option 2: Greenfield (re-implement with a clean baseline)

A Greenfield approach can be appropriate when an organisation wants to introduce new products or lines of business, or implement a new operating model. It can offer a cleaner solution design, but still requires strong decisions on data scope and migration complexity.

How to choose: align the strategy with (1) business priorities, (2) the complexity of integrations and data, and (3) your ability to run stabilisation and change management simultaneously.

How to ensure a successful Guidewire Cloud migration?

Before you start the main build, create a short “programme spine”:

  • Define the business objectives and value metrics (what will change, what will improve and by when).
  • Confirm regulatory and security requirements and how they will be evidenced.
  • Decide how the cost model and budgeting will work (including OPEX planning).
  • Validate the readiness of your current architecture and integration landscape.

Then run the delivery in clear, outcome-oriented steps:

  • Step 1 - How should readiness be assessed and the roadmap defined?

Start by defining business outcomes, assessing the current environment, and identifying gaps in IT, processes and skills. Many failures come from incomplete planning, so treat the roadmap as a risk-reduction tool, not just paperwork.

  • Step 2 - How should configuration vs. customization be balanced, and why does it matter?

Insurers often overcustomise new solutions. Unnecessary customisation in cloud programmes creates long-term friction, especially when updates are frequent. Therefore, aim for a clean configuration baseline and customise only where it clearly supports business value.

  • Step 3 - How to approach data migration without surprises?

Data work is often one of the biggest challenges, because it includes quality, compliance, ownership and operational reporting requirements. It is important to plan the scope of the data early on, set realistic expectations for data cleansing, and design migration and access patterns that support analytics and governance after the system goes live.

  • Step 4 - What a complete testing strategy must include to avoid costly late failures?

Many programmes fail due to insufficient testing. Treat testing as an ongoing strategy covering performance, security and user acceptance, rather than a final phase. A useful mindset in this field is: “upgrade projects are testing projects.”

If you use accelerators for quality and regression testing, keep the story business-friendly: the goal is shorter stabilisation, fewer production incidents, and faster adoption of regular updates.

  • Step 5 - What does a “good go-live” and optimisation look like?

Deployment is not the finish line. Plan for post go-live monitoring, hypercare and a clear ownership model (who owns what, how changes are delivered). This is also where you lay the groundwork for ongoing value, such as adopting new capabilities, expanding integrations and optimising automation.

Fast & trusted Guidewire® implementation partner

Helping P&C insurers around the world implement Guidewire solutions since 2011

Which lessons learned make the biggest difference?

Guidewire Cloud migrations run more smoothly when teams treat them as a business transformation involving a new operating model rather than just a technical move. The most impactful lessons concern discipline, sequencing, and clear ownership.

Testing must be a strategic process, not an afterthought. Validate end-to-end journeys, performance, security and monitoring early on, and treat stabilisation as a deliberate stage with clear quality gates. Data is rarely “ready” by default – delays usually stem from unclear scope, ownership, quality criteria and post-go-live reporting requirements, so agree on governance and usage patterns from the outset. Integrations often determine timelines, so it is important to identify legacy dependencies in advance, prioritise by business criticality and test end-to-end with real external systems well before go-live. Finally, avoid excessive customisation and define the post-go-live operating model ahead of time (including roles, decision-making and release adoption), so that the organisation can continue to deliver value after migration.

What are the most common challenges – and how are they handled?

Most challenges fall into three categories, and many programmes encounter unforeseen issues along the way, so success often depends on an adaptive approach and the right support.

  • Data reality vs data assumptions: data quality can quickly become a programme-level risk, so it needs governance, clear scope and transparent trade-offs.
  • Integration complexity: legacy systems and “in-flight” operations can complicate timelines, so reduce risk through early discovery, smart sequencing and realistic end-to-end testing.
  • Skills and capacity constraints: cloud and security skills are in high demand and migration work competes with business-as-usual. This is why many insurers rely on experienced external partners for architecture, integration, data and delivery acceleration when speed and predictability matter.

What happens after migration - and how do you keep the value growing?

After the system goes live, the focus shifts to adoption and continuous improvement. Monitor user experience, build feedback loops with “power users,” and establish a sustainable release cadence for how updates are assessed, tested and adopted. Over time, expand the ecosystem by integrating third-party solutions that strengthen automation, underwriting and analytics. ("How to approach Guidewire Cloud updates").

What results can insurers expect after moving to Guidewire Cloud?

With a value-driven approach, insurers can respond to market changes faster and free up capacity for innovation by reducing the burden of upgrades. They can also roll out and integrate new capabilities more smoothly across underwriting and other areas, thanks to a foundation designed for ongoing development. The outcome is a platform that balances reliability with flexibility – provided the program treats data migration as a core workstream from the outset. Data scope, quality, ownership, and post-go-live reporting decisions made early are what prevents last-minute delays and ensures that the cloud move translates into measurable business outcomes.

Conclusion

The most successful Guidewire Cloud migrations treat the move as a business transformation rather than just a platform change.

Begin by defining clear objectives, selecting a migration strategy that aligns with your data and integration requirements, and establishing a consistent approach to testing, governance, and release adoption. After the system goes live, focus on adoption and continuous improvement to expand automation, analytics and underwriting capabilities.

With the right approach, insurers can achieve faster time-to-market, greater innovation capacity and a foundation that balances reliability with flexibility.

Authors of the article

 

      Grzegorz Fedoryński - IT Designer

Technology & Market Insights

Automation From slow automation to fast, repeatable releases
CEO Voices CEO Voices – Interview with Agnès Paquin, CEO of CNP Assurances IARD
Guidewire QA for Guidewire Cloud migration: a key to stay ahead in a demanding market
Guidewire Guidewire Cloud migration: faster innovation, lower costs, bigger impact
guidewire cloud
Cloud, Guidewire How to approach updates on Guidewire Cloud – from release cadence to adoption